Download India After Gandhi The History of the World's Largest Democracy doc ✓ 912 pages ☆ Ramachandra Guha

reader India After Gandhi The History of the World's Largest Democracy

Download India After Gandhi The History of the World's Largest Democracy doc ✓ 912 pages ☆ Ramachandra Guha ò A magisterial account of the pains the struggles the humiliations and the glories of the world's largest and least likely democracy Ramachandra GuhA magisterial account of the pains the struggles the humiliations and the glories of the world's largest and least likely democracy Ramachandra Guha's India A “Indians are better speakers than listeners and Indian politicians especially so” There probably never will be a completely satisfying book about India but this one really far exceeded what I could have expected In here is no talk about the ‘Hindu way of life’ thank you Naipaul or other vague expressions and generalizations like that There is in fact the very opposite a great diversity of voices looking at the subjects from different perspectives At a few times I didn’t agree with author’s conclusions view spoilerI think for example it was a wrong sort of politeness that made Nehru government to settle for less than a common civil code and exempt Muslims from marital and inheritance reform laws hide spoiler

reader ✓ India After Gandhi The History of the World's Largest Democracy ✓ Ramachandra Guha

Tricately researched and elegantly written epic history peopled with larger than life characters it is the work of a major scholar at the peak of his abilitie Even the persons who are giving five stars to this book are not missing an opportunity to call the author a Congress party loyal and he distorted some facts to pay the homage to Congress party That is enough for even an ordinary citizen to think about his writings These kinds of writers only show their loyalty to a certain group rather than doing any great workThe book has done nothing than creating the image of Gandhi family as larger than life The author like Ramchandra Guha tries to establish his hegemony over Indian history What he is saying that is right and what others are saying is absolutely wrong

Ramachandra Guha ✓ India After Gandhi The History of the World's Largest Democracy book

India After Gandhi The History of the World's Largest DemocracyFter Gandhi is a breathtaking chronicle of the brutal conflicts that have rocked a giant nation and the extraordinary factors that have held it together An in Unfortunately the book is extremely underwhelming for those who have than passing interest in political history of India It is consistently biased in favor of a NehruvianCongressLeftist Marxist viewpoint Guha's hero worship of Nehru a leader with many flaws is also less than neutral He also sweeps under the floor the history of corruption in India since independence Mr Guha is partial toward First Prime minister Mr Nehru and never criticize him at any moment and over this writer is trying to save Nehru from any such side Nehru is venerated like a god by writer You will find half of book dedicated to nehru and as a fan on Nehru writer give his super human abilities of solving everythingAll the events described will be in and around congress and its activists I think historians shouldn’t do such kind of things Glorification of INC is the main propaganda of this book and hence lacks a balanced view needed for any keen history student They should describe the events in an unbiased manner and leave the opinion to readers Instead in the whole book you find the authors opinion on how congress struggle or manage India Few great people are just mentioned by name in some incidences and not about their contribution Even state parties also contributed towards IndiaSince Mr Guha has dedicated a large chunk of the book to the political lives of Indira Gandhi and Nehru I would've like to have been informed of the implications of their policy decisions he does touch on some and also their failings Nehru's in particular Not saying that I think Nehru was a failure but Id have liked to have heard a mock debate between the pro and anti Nehru factions as well as the pro and anti Gandhi factions There was no defense of these giants of the country which makes sense since there were no real criticisms presented in the book Even if the author felt no criticism was warranted he could have addressed the criticisms of other writers thinkers This is the least he could have done for Nehru who he obviously admiresNo time devoted to the financial world and the industrial world and the world of the Indian scams Ambani the entrepreneur and rule breaker Harshad Mehta the fodder scam etc barely get a mention No mention of indigenous Indian governmental scheme's for the various reforms There are some big holes in the book Even details on wars was not properly mentioned The chapters on PV Narasimha Rao Vajpayee primarily deal with Secularism issues totally ignoring the strides India made in Economy Foreign policy Defense etc during their era Millions of Indians including me owe our jobs to PVN's economic policies If India has finally emerged as a force to reckon with it is primarily due to the economic policies of PVN and Vajpayee governments It is truly astonishing that the impact the new policies have had on lifting millions of Indians out of poverty over the last two decades is not given the importance it deserves in the book Even foreign economists like Robert Shiller who called PVN India's Deng Xio Peng The author buries the legacy of PVN and Vajpayee in the issue of secularism There are so many things to point out but i don't have that much time to mentioned all that here These kind of books set bad precedent Even you can see this book have high ratings As another reviewer has said one should remind Guha the words of the great historian R C Majumdar who reiterated that The aim of history is to solely tell the truth by conscientious finding it out without any respect for individual or communities But 'India after Gandhi' is dishonest history there is no objectivity and Guha seems interested to propagandize his readers than to present a neutral bookRead it to know one side of the coin No one book or may be any at all will ever completely articulate the other side of the coin Even an extremely biased and opinionated book like this cannot spin it well to lead the readers to the authors point of view Highly disappointed I don't want to recommend it